Criteria
|
Exceeds Standard
(3)
|
Meets Standard (2)
|
Needs Improvement
(1)
|
Volume: How well
you can be heard
|
Voice is loud and
clear without the student yelling. All
words are heard. Student projects
words from their diaphragm.
|
Voice is loud
throughout most of presentation. One
or more words might be lost because of projection of volume, but the idea is
still clear.
|
Voice fades in
places so that the listener loses or misses parts of the presentation, or
parts of the idea
|
Pronunciation: How
well you say all your words
|
Words are
pronounced perfectly and sentences flow off of tongue
|
The speaker trips
in one or two places either in the pronunciation of a word or in reading a
sentence. The presentation is effected
only slightly by the mistakes.
|
The speaker trips
in quite a few places. The
presentation is effected more than slightly by the mistakes. Mistakes either make the presentation hard
to listen to or cloud the ideas of the writing
|
Tone: Do you vary
how you say your sentences
|
Speaker as
Actor: The speaker’s delivery makes
the writing come alive by giving it emotion, character, emphasis, by
breathing life into it
|
Speaker varies most
of sentences to express emotion or to emphasis importance of parts, but there
are still places when the speaker spoke in a lifeless monotone
|
Speaker speaks in a
monotone that reveals no emotion or does not emphasis any importance on any
idea
|
UHMS or AHS
|
NONE
|
1 or 2 but the uhms
or ahs do not distract the presentation
|
3 or more uhms or
ahs
|
Eye Contact: do you
look at your audience
|
The speaker made a
point to look at everyone in the room and rarely looked as if they were
reading from a paper
|
Some eye contact is
made, but mostly the presenter read off of his or her paper
|
Little or no eye
contact.
|
Monday, 13 April 2015
Oral Rubric
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment